Response Paper 1 - Enacted Environment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Response Paper 1 - Enacted Environment - rise ExampleThey succeed in some styles and fall short in new(prenominal)s. However, even more than than falling short of explaining themselves adequately, their arguments simply lonesome(prenominal) apply in some cases but non all. It is my judgement that their ideas argon very helpful in cases in which they are applicable, but there are many another(prenominal) cases in which these ideas do not apply. There are reasons why the traditional practices of strategic management collapse been used for as long as they have by so many businesses, and there is something to be said for victimisation them, so I can see this argument from both sides. What the authors are reflection offers a new and useful perspective that can certainly be helpful when it applies, and their view is something that to the highest degree managers fail to even acknowledge and can benefit from recognizing. However, I do not think it should be presented as the only possible view that applies, as traditional strategic management views really are the most useful in some situations. Yes, managers must look at themselves and their situations objectively, but external trends and consumer patterns cannot be ignored. It is true, as the authors of this article claim, that it is important for managers to look within themselves and their organizations when attempting to solve problems, but managers also need TEXAS gray judge judy to observe what is going on in the market and in the minds of consumers, because their opinions and misconceptions are very real. Ultimately, it emphatically makes sense to unlearn debilitating concepts and to take risks that others refuse to take, but it does not make sense to do this instead of sounding at the environment. Why not do both? In my opinion, their refusal to consider the other methods is just as dangerous as the idea of using only the other methods exclusively. In wrong of whether or not the authors convinced me, the answer is somewhat. While their analogies were helpful, none of the examples really proved an obiter dictum in which their perspectives worked better than others the only examples given listed failures of the other models to work and how these failures could have been prevented or corrected using their model, instead. Understandably, their model has probably not been used by many companies yet, and if so, it probably has not been studied in practice, so these examples were likely difficult to find. Ultimately, my conclusion is that the authors are correct that it is dangerous for a person to stupefy confined by his or her own beliefs to the extent that that person has created an environment in which things can only be done a certain way, and he or she will not consider stepping away(p) of the box. However, whether accurate or not, consumers do have very real beliefs and behavioral patterns that should not be denied or overlooked for the sake of self-analysis. With regard to what difference this articles ideas will make to the way I view or practice management, the authors do a good job of emphasizing the importance of looking inward first, before blaming outside factors for influence or failure, so this is something I would change or implement. whiz example of an external environmental factor that came to mind as I was reading this article is the way that the economy has sort of become the buzz word for consumers these days. Everyone uses the economy as the reason for everything, whether or not it has personally affected them. Consumers use